Entries from March 2007

Triscuit or Wheat Thin?

March 30, 2007 · 2 Comments

Perhaps you’ve played this tiresome drinking ritual.

Madonna or Kylie? White wine or red? Spit or lube?

Dull drinking games aside, has anyone else noticed the apparent joy and senseless instinct we seem to have for exclaiming, in no uncertain terms, our preferences and sides on almost any issue, no matter how niggling? Is American culture so caught up in political polarization (red state or blue?, Obama or Hillary?) that we feel the need to establish, unasked, our preferences for everything in our little lives?

I see it on t-shirts a lot lately as well. Mostly girls but some ironic queers, sporting ‘Team Jolie’ or ‘Team Anniston’ t-shirts, and even, a bit closer to home, ‘Team Newsom’ tees too.

As noted last entry, I like Mika, the slender-hipped, foxy-fey-falsetto goodness currently blasting from the boyfriend’s iPod (as well as from a phone advert on TV, I see. Go Mika). But then this either/or choice bullshit kicks in and I wonder which I like more: Mika or Scissor Sisters? Clearly, on some level, I feel I don’t have the capacity to like TWO popular, high-note hitting musical homos. So a choice must be made!

Same goes for Lily Allen or Amy Winehouse, mostly because although they occupy slightly different musical genres, they seem to be semi-competitive frenemies, and so of course I feel obligated to pick a side.

I have a friend who insists that every homosexual alive falls into one of two camps: “Bette” or “Barbra”. And when he tells me this, I don’t think “I own no music from either”, “Why can’t I like both?”, “Why are you telling me this?” or even, more to the point “Are you sure you’re a top?”.
Instead, I look him square in the eye, and firmly tell him “I’m all about the Bette.”

Categories: music and media

And I Love It

March 29, 2007 · 1 Comment

we predict this cutie will be big, and for the next video, we’d like to see him shirtless please

we predict plenty o’ drag queens will be sporting these duds soon. Specifically, Donna Sashay.

Categories: queer

Women on the Web

March 28, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Growing up as a young queerling, I got along much better with girls than I did with boys, by and large, and by choice would surround myself with girls instead of boys at every opportunity. While that statement falls a little short of ‘news’, ‘different’, or even ‘interesting’, I will say it is a least a little of the latter that as a queer adult, in San Francisco, that the exact opposite is now true.

I have two female friends, one who lives in DC, the other I see about once every two months at best. Otherwise, with the exception of work, I go, literally, for weeks without speaking or interacting with an actual female. Instead, my social life, such as it is, is full to bursting with queer men. Thank god at least one of them is black. Also, I know a Filipino.

I remember during my training at CUAV, looking around my training group and seeing one other male, and about 12 females. “This place,” I recall thinking “totally runs on pussy power.” Which, culturally, as caregivers/emotional supporters, etc. makes a sort of unfortunate sense, and living in a society where males are reared to be somewhat emotionally constipated, women typically are better at communicating, in general.

So you’d think they’d feel at home on the world wide interweb, what with women and the web both operating via a series of tubes. (Sorry. That’s me, hopefully, at my most misogynistic). And the fact that, at least in theory, there is an element of privacy and anonymity that could appeal to women who, let’s face it, aren’t always safe in our society.

That anonymity cuts both ways, and for one blogger Kathy Sierra, that anonymity has allowed (at least one) very, very sick fuckhead to harrass, intimidate, and threaten Sierra into an almost seemingly catatonic state. I seriously don’t get it. Why are some men so freakin’ threatened by a woman achieving a modicum of fame/power/influence on the Web (or anywhere)? Why does it seem, even before the situation went nuclear with the latest death-threat/sexual mutililation moron, that women are sometimes less than welcome on the Web?

As always, Violet Blue sums it up nicely:

“Sierra’s haters — and the man behind the hate, in my friend’s case — are doing this not because they’re immature. They’re doing it because they want women out of their worlds. Every female tech and sex writer I have contact with knows this — every girl whose work has been Dugg, Slashdotted or commented on in a forum that allows trolls to fester. When someone goes this far, to make death imagery and maintain a 24/7 hate blog, we’re not talking about a lack of social skills, we’re talking about a desire to destroy. These are the same kind of acts of sexual hatred that Patrick Califia wrote about in his essay about the sex-murder of transgender teen Gwen Araujo in “Sex With the Imperfect Stranger”:

“This strategy relies on widespread social acceptance of the belief that this is what straight men are supposed to do when their heterosexual identities are threatened. They are supposed to murder in defense of their masculinity. Because if one of them doesn’t do this, if he does not violently repudiate the possibility that he found it pleasurable to have sexual contact with someone who was not born female, then he must be queer himself.”

In these situations, Califia tells us, “The victim in such cases is usually deliberately sought out by the attackers, hunted down and intimidated, battered or slaughtered. Violence against sexual minority people is a sport.”

When you’re female in Blogistan, you expose yourself to a whole new kind of hate, and often your male colleagues (or your community) have no idea what it feels like.

But we belong here, too.”

Categories: technology

Naked Conversations

March 27, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Schoblefarmertan Oi! My ‘blogging break’ extended itself for so long that now, the part of my brain that files away interesting tidbits or begins composing articles while stuck on Muni, is sorely out of shape.

Seeing Robert Scoble talk today was a great kick to the head to begin blogging again. He is, as you might guess, a social and engaging chap but the most interesting thing I noted (other than he referred to Twitter.com 28 times in 90 minutes) was the dynamic between Robert and the audience of a hundred or more people. His book, and in theory, his ‘talk’, was about how blogs are changing the way businesses communicate with their customers, about how business blogs allowed customers and businesses to have an actual conversation via blogs, etc.

While Robert certainly addressed this, he also veered off into other, related areas based on the comments and questions from the audience, as you might imagine. Several people, however, seemed miffed that he didn’t stay exactly on topic, with one gent even pointedly asking ‘Back to today’s topic, what would be the first five things you’d recommend to a company set to launch a new product?’

I found that amusing and a little ironic, given that Robert’s whole spiel is about how businesses can no longer operate with information/communication flowing in one direction, but instead must engage in a conversation with consumers. Which is exactly what Robert was doing with the audience, and it made me smile that people in attendace knew enough about this changing business paradigm to attend this talk, yet they seemed to want and crave a more focused, speechy, one way flow of info from Robert to the audience.

Speaking of, now that I’ve both changed the name of my blog AND moved over to wordpress, Comments will be once again an option. So talk to me about anything other than penis enlargement, please.

Robert’s book is Naked Conversations and the above picture was nixed from mortarblog.com.

Categories: san francisco · technology