A recent SFgate article on the mass exodus of middle and low income earners from SF. . .
From 2002 to 2006, the number of households [in San Francisco] making up to $49,000 per year dropped by 7.4 percent, those earning between $50,000 and $99,999 declined by 4.4 percent, and those bringing home between $100,000 and $149,999 fell by 3.9 percent, according to Census Bureau estimates. In polar opposition, the number of households making between $150,000 and $199,999 surged 52.2 percent and those earning more than $200,000 climbed 40.1 percent.
“A kind of derogatory term for the city would be Disneyland for yuppies,” said Hans Johnson, demographer with the Public Policy Institute of California.
Funnily enough, I was speaking with someone this weekend about the fact that I may soon be moving to the East Bay. A big fan of pro-and-con lists, my friend cited the former as being: real seasons and hot summers and comparitively cheaper rent. High and bold on the con list? It is the East Bay. Crime, for starters, and a dearth of any real gay nightlife.
If I end up going to school ‘over there’, it will seal the deal. Not a shock for my friend from across the bridge. “I’d just assumed that is what the guy, which I thought was you, was doing in your dixie exile header. . .staring across the water to the east bay, through all that damn SF fog.”



